Jump to content

Talk:Jewish Council of Australia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Potential undue content in history

[edit]

Is every statement the group makes notable for inclusion in WP? Content here already potentially meets WP:Undue I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be unnecessary to include statements that can only be sourced to their website, but if it’s newsworthy then that’s a different story
Also it’s in a list-ish format as I’m just getting the information on there, I’ll probably go back and synthesise it a bit more but anyone can do that at any time. GraziePrego (talk) 11:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be deleted for Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)

[edit]

This organization has only recently popped up, and in a quote it was compared to the AJA. The AJA is a right wing group that is as much on the fringe as this group, but it has received much more press and has been around longer and yet it doesn't have a wikipedia article. This made me think that neither group really should have an article because they lack any real notability. Seraphya (talk) 06:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The AJA lacking an article is not a reason for this article to be deleted. If the AJA has significant coverage, then it likely also meets the notability guidelines. GraziePrego (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think so, I am not so strongly convinced either way. I think they are both kind of flash in the pan, but I can see the other side as ell. Seraphya (talk) 05:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]